Logo
Report contents
← The Crypto Livability Index

SSA · Developing

Tanzania

Crypto Livability Index 2025·data to 31 Dec 2025

Livability rank
#66 / 79
Rails rank
#66 / 79
Need shift
no shift

Scoreboard

Five pillars, then the 22 sub-pillars scored 0 to 4. Empty sub-scores are held out of the total, not zeroed.

Five pillars
P1 Access6 / 16
P2 Regulation12 / 20
P3 Spending8 / 20
P4 Infrastructure2 / 12
P5 Community2 / 16
22 sub-pillars (0–4)
3
P1.1
Exchange access
not scored
P1.2
P2P liquidity
0
P1.3
ATM density
1
P1.4
On/off-ramp friction
2
P1.5
Stablecoin access
2
P2.1
Legal status
3
P2.2
Tax treatment
1
P2.3
Income legality
3
P2.4
KYC burden
3
P2.5
Regulatory trajectory
2
P3.1
Gift cards
1
P3.2
Direct merchants
1
P3.3
Crypto cards
0
P3.4
Utility bills
4
P3.5
Connectivity
0
P4.1
Internet penetration
1
P4.2
Smartphone penetration
1
P4.4
Remittance corridor
double-edged
0
P5.1
Meetups and events
1
P5.2
Crypto media
0
P5.3
Social sentiment
1
P5.4
Developer density

The number behind the rank

Raw capability score30 / 84
P2P liquidity bonus (tie-breaker)+0
Inflation 3.4% · unbanked 40% · remittances 1.4% GDP · capital controls 0.84 · sanctions 0 CNI 0.273
Need multiplier×0.909
Livability score0.325

Raw 30/84 = 0.357 capability. Crypto-Necessity Index 0.27, from five components: inflation 3.4% (three-year average 2023 to 2025), unbanked 40% of adults, remittances 1.4% of GDP, capital-control intensity 0.84 (KAOPEN 2023), sanctions exposure 0. Need multiplier ×0.91. Livability score 0.325, rank #66 of 79.

Three findings

A court that ruled crypto trading is not illegal

In Yellow Card Tanzania versus Nyamwero, the High Court held in 2025 that the absence of a legal framework does not make crypto unlawful, and awarded the plaintiff 1.193 million dollars, reasoning that an asset which is taxed cannot be illegal. Combined with the Finance Act 2024's 3 percent withholding tax on digital-asset transfers, the first legal recognition of virtual assets, this gives Tanzania a tax sub-score of 3 despite having no licensing regime.

Tax-first recognition without a VASP framework

Tanzania has expressly brought virtual-asset activity under its anti-money-laundering rules while issuing no VASP (virtual asset service provider) licences, a hybrid posture: formal AML coverage, no licensing, and a revenue authority that treats crypto as taxable income. Roughly 2.3 million Tanzanians hold crypto and stablecoin usage is growing 53 percent year-on-year, faster than Kenya.

Connectivity is the binding constraint, not regulation

Unique-user internet penetration is just 29.1 percent, dropping the access sub-score to zero, against a state regulator's inflated 85.3 percent active-SIM figure. No direct merchant gateway analogous to Kenya's Tando or South Africa's MoneyBadger had launched by the cutoff, leaving the market P2P-only (peer-to-peer trading between individuals) and mobile-money-dominated, with crypto remittances a niche 1 to 3 percent of a small 650 million dollar corridor.

In one line

"A Tanzanian court settled the question its lawmakers had not: an asset the state taxes cannot be an asset the state forbids. The recognition is real; the bandwidth to use it, with under a third of the country online, is the harder gap."

Watch in 2026

Trajectory 3/4, trending liberalising. The Finance Act 2024's 3 percent withholding tax, the High Court's affirmation that trading is not illegal, and pro-crypto signals from President Samia all point toward a formal VASP framework on Kenya's model, likely in 2026 to 2027. The 2019 central-bank warnings remain technically in force but are unenforced and contradicted by the legislative and judicial branches.

Regional neighbours
Data vintage 31 December 2025 · CLI vv1.3 · Genghis Research · CC BY 4.0