Logo
Report contents
← The Crypto Livability Index

APAC · Pioneer

Singapore

Crypto Livability Index 2025·data to 31 Dec 2025

Livability rank
#45 / 79
Rails rank
#15 / 79
Need shift
▼ -30

Scoreboard

Five pillars, then the 22 sub-pillars scored 0 to 4. Empty sub-scores are held out of the total, not zeroed.

Five pillars
P1 Access11 / 16
P2 Regulation13 / 20
P3 Spending19 / 20
P4 Infrastructure8 / 12
P5 Community14 / 16
22 sub-pillars (0–4)
4
P1.1
Exchange access
not scored
P1.2
P2P liquidity
0
P1.3
ATM density
4
P1.4
On/off-ramp friction
3
P1.5
Stablecoin access
3
P2.1
Legal status
4
P2.2
Tax treatment
3
P2.3
Income legality
1
P2.4
KYC burden
2
P2.5
Regulatory trajectory
4
P3.1
Gift cards
4
P3.2
Direct merchants
4
P3.3
Crypto cards
3
P3.4
Utility bills
4
P3.5
Connectivity
4
P4.1
Internet penetration
4
P4.2
Smartphone penetration
0
P4.4
Remittance corridor
double-edged
4
P5.1
Meetups and events
4
P5.2
Crypto media
4
P5.3
Social sentiment
2
P5.4
Developer density

The number behind the rank

Raw capability score65 / 84
P2P liquidity bonus (tie-breaker)+1
Inflation 2.7% · unbanked 2% · remittances 0% GDP · capital controls 0 · sanctions 0 CNI 0.015
Need multiplier×0.523
Livability score0.404

Raw 65/84 = 0.774 capability. Crypto-Necessity Index 0.01, from five components: inflation 2.7% (three-year average 2023 to 2025), unbanked 2% of adults, remittances 0% of GDP, capital-control intensity 0.00 (KAOPEN 2023), sanctions exposure 0. Need multiplier ×0.52. Livability score 0.404, rank #45 of 79.

Three findings

Capability of a global hub, need of almost zero: minus 30 places

Singapore ranks #15 on raw capability but falls to #45 once need is applied. The Crypto-Necessity Index is 0.01, the lowest in the region: inflation 2.7%, 2% of adults unbanked, remittances effectively 0% of GDP. As a wealthy financial centre with a large migrant workforce sending money out, it is structurally a remittance sender, not a market with survival demand.

A zero capital-gains regime that was never a crypto carve-out

Individual investors pay no tax on crypto gains, not because of a targeted exemption but because Singapore has never had a general capital-gains tax, making the shield structurally more durable than temporary reliefs elsewhere. The spending stack is deep: MAS-licensed gateways onboard luxury retail, department stores and the entire GrabPay base, and at least two Tier-1 cards serve residents.

Among the strictest KYC regimes on Earth, by deliberate design

The travel rule carries no anonymous threshold, unhosted-wallet withdrawals require proof of ownership, and the Digital Token Service Provider regime that took effect 30 June 2025 extends licensing extraterritorially to Singapore-based providers serving overseas users. Retail lending and staking are banned. The friction is a policy choice, not a market gap.

In one line

"Singapore offers a zero-tax, fully licensed home for crypto wealth and one of the strictest rulebooks anywhere. What it does not offer its own residents is a reason to need any of it."

Watch in 2026

Trajectory 2/4, stable to mixed. MAS expanded Major Payment Institution licensing and granted seven new digital-token licences in 2025, but the Digital Token Service Provider regime that took effect 30 June 2025 forces offshore-only providers to cease unless licensed, with approvals granted in only "extremely limited circumstances," and retail lending and staking are banned. Compliant institutions gain runway while consumer-facing unlicensed access is squeezed.

Regional neighbours
Data vintage 31 December 2025 · CLI vv1.3 · Genghis Research · CC BY 4.0