Logo
Report contents
← The Crypto Livability Index

Europe · Developing

Belarus

Crypto Livability Index 2025·data to 31 Dec 2025

Livability rank
#44 / 79
Rails rank
#65 / 79
Need shift
▲ +21

Scoreboard

Five pillars, then the 22 sub-pillars scored 0 to 4. Empty sub-scores are held out of the total, not zeroed.

Five pillars
P1 Access7 / 16
P2 Regulation10 / 20
P3 Spending4 / 20
P4 Infrastructure7 / 12
P5 Community3 / 16
22 sub-pillars (0–4)
3
P1.1
Exchange access
not scored
P1.2
P2P liquidity
0
P1.3
ATM density
1
P1.4
On/off-ramp friction
3
P1.5
Stablecoin access
3
P2.1
Legal status
2
P2.2
Tax treatment
2
P2.3
Income legality
1
P2.4
KYC burden
2
P2.5
Regulatory trajectory
1
P3.1
Gift cards
1
P3.2
Direct merchants
0
P3.3
Crypto cards
0
P3.4
Utility bills
2
P3.5
Connectivity
4
P4.1
Internet penetration
3
P4.2
Smartphone penetration
0
P4.4
Remittance corridor
double-edged
0
P5.1
Meetups and events
1
P5.2
Crypto media
0
P5.3
Social sentiment
2
P5.4
Developer density

The number behind the rank

Raw capability score31 / 84
P2P liquidity bonus (tie-breaker)+2
Inflation 5.8% · unbanked 19% · remittances 2.4% GDP · capital controls 0.58 · sanctions 1 CNI 0.397
Need multiplier×1.096
Livability score0.404

Raw 31/84 = 0.369 capability. Crypto-Necessity Index 0.40, from five components: inflation 5.8% (three-year average 2023 to 2025), unbanked 19% of adults, remittances 2.4% of GDP, capital-control intensity 0.58 (KAOPEN 2023), sanctions exposure 1. Need multiplier ×1.10. Livability score 0.404, rank #44 of 79.

Three findings

An early crypto pioneer that has funnelled every retail trade through four state exchanges

Belarus legalised mining, exchanges and holdings back in 2018 under the High-Tech Park decree, with a 9% tax rate locked until 2049. But Decree 367, effective September 2024, concentrates all individual crypto activity onto four state-supervised HTP exchanges, criminalises peer-to-peer (person-to-person) trades and foreign-platform access, and puts the National Bank in continuous watch over every fiat gateway. The KYC sub-score sits at 1.

One crypto event in the entire country in 2025

Belarus records a single tracked crypto event for the whole year, scoring 0 on community activity, the floor of the ecosystem pillar. The auditor's read is blunt: a once-promising legal framework has been hollowed out by sanctions and geopolitical isolation, leaving Belarus functionally disconnected from the global Web3 ecosystem. There are no active crypto ATMs either.

Real need, almost no capability to meet it, hence a muted 19-place climb

Belarus carries a Crypto-Necessity Index of 0.40 from 19% unbanked, capital-control intensity 0.58 and full sanctions exposure, yet scores only 31 of 84 in raw capability. The ×1.10 need multiplier lifts it from rails #63 to livability #44. The index rewards the pressure, but there is little working infrastructure for that pressure to act on.

In one line

"Belarus has the need and once had the rules. What sanctions and a state-only channel left behind is a market where the pressure to use crypto is real and the means to act on it have been quietly closed off."

Watch in 2026

Trajectory 2/4, stable with mixed signals. The liberalising side extended the crypto tax exemption through 2025 and the HTP regime to 2049, with a crypto-bank framework under development. The tightening side blocked Bybit, OKX, Bitget, BingX, Gate and Weex on 9 December 2025 and added mandatory individual income declaration. If those December exchange blocks expand in 2026, the trajectory slides to 1.

Data vintage: 31 December 2025. Flagged estimate: the unbanked input is a documented gap-fill (no uniform Findex value for this country); bounded and disclosed in Appendix A. A documented 2024 to 2025 capital-account policy event postdates the KAOPEN 2023 vintage; re-scored in the published sensitivity analysis (Appendix A.8).
Regional neighbours
Data vintage 31 December 2025 · CLI vv1.3 · Genghis Research · CC BY 4.0